Source: European Parliament
Priority question for written answer P-002909/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Mariusz Kamiński (ECR)
In Commission Communication COM(2025)319 of 11 June 2025, entitled ‘State of play on the implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum’[1], it was noted that 25 Member States had submitted their national implementation plans for the migration pact. At the same time, it was stated that all Member States, with the exception of Hungary, had ‘regularly engaged with the Commission on the implementation of the Pact’.
In footnote 13, the Commission clarifies that ‘Hungary communicated to the Commission that it does not intend to prepare a NIP. Poland submitted its position on the implementation of the Pact’.
On the basis of the above information, it can be concluded that, unlike Hungary, Poland has not declared an intention not to prepare a national implementation plan and that it has been regularly engaging with the Commission in this regard.
In the light of the foregoing:
- 1.On the basis of which document submitted by Poland and which of its points did the Commission come up with the assessment set out in footnote 13?
- 2.On what basis did the Commission include Poland among the Member States that ‘regularly engaged’ with the Commission on the implementation of the pact?
- 3.How does the Commission assess the current state of implementation of the Pact on Migration by Poland?
Submitted: 16.7.2025
- [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0319