Highlights – Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

Source: European Parliament

On Tuesday, 20 May 2025, the FEMM Committee will vote on a draft opinion on the “Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum”.

With less than five years left until the deadline for realisation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, further action is needed especially regarding SDG 5. SDG 5 seeks to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls’ – there is still a lot to do and it’s time to implement it.

Members will vote on 190 amendments and 16 alternative compromises to finalise the FEMM opinion to the DEVE and ENVI committees.

Written question – Follow-up question on substantive pledges and cabinet positions promised by the Commission to the European Greens – E-001815/2025

Source: European Parliament

Question for written answer  E-001815/2025/rev.1
to the Commission
Rule 144
Marieke Ehlers (PfE), Auke Zijlstra (PfE), Sebastiaan Stöteler (PfE), Ton Diepeveen (PfE), Rachel Blom (PfE), Sebastian Kruis (PfE)

In its answer to Written Question P-002983/2024[1] the Commission states – in a particularly brief fashion – that its meetings with party leaders covered ‘both policy priorities and organisational issues’.

  • 1.Were all political groups represented in the Commission’s ‘exchanges of views’ and were they therefore given an equal opportunity to formulate policy positions?
  • 2.What organisational issues were discussed?
  • 3.Which advisers, cabinet members and other staff were recruited within the Commission, or as external advisers, and at the request of which political group?

Submitted: 6.5.2025

  • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-10-2024-002983-ASW_EN.html
Last updated: 14 May 2025

Briefing – Greece’s climate action strategy – 14-05-2025

Source: European Parliament

Greece’s climate law sets the objective of reaching climate neutrality by 2050 (see trajectory in Figure 1) and of delivering a 55 % reduction of net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2030 compared with 1990. Greece accounted for 2.3 % of the EU’s net GHG emissions in 2023, and achieved a net emissions reduction of 48.5 % from 2005 to 2023, greater than the EU average reduction of 30.5 % over the same period. Emissions from sectors under the EU emissions trading system (ETS) fell by almost two thirds. Greece’s land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) sector has functioned as a moderate carbon sink throughout the 2005-2023 period. For the effort-sharing sectors, Greece has consistently overachieved its targets. Greece’s national recovery and resilience plan, amended with a REPowerEU chapter, dedicates 38.2 % of investment to the green transition. Greece submitted a draft updated national energy and climate plan (NECP) in November 2023. The European Commission assessed it and made recommendations for the final updated NECP, which was submitted in January 2025. In a 2023 survey, 44 % of Greeks, compared with an EU average of 46 %, identified climate change to be one of the four most serious problems facing the world. Most expect national government (74 %), the EU (73 %) and/or business and industry (73 %) to tackle climate change. Less than a third find it to be a personal responsibility. This briefing is one in a series covering all EU Member States.

Answer to a written question – Environmental impact of the Commission’s AI Continent strategy – E-000722/2025(ASW)

Source: European Parliament

The initiatives of the artificial intelligence (AI) Continent Action Plan[1] are aligned with the EU Green Deal. The hosting sites of the AI Factories were notably selected on sustainability criteria. The AI Factory initiative emphasises green computing through energy-efficient supercomputers, dynamic power saving methods, and advanced cooling systems. The AI Factory in Jülich will be built around the JUPITER Exascale Supercomputer, whose first module currently is the world’s most energy-efficient system[2]. Additionally, the Commission will hold dialogues with consortia interested in launching sustainable AI Gigafactories.

Moreover, the upcoming Cloud and AI Development Act will create the incentives to build sustainable data centres. It will aim to advance research and innovation in resource-efficient data processing infrastructures, software, and services that enable the development and adoption of AI. This includes research to improve the integration of data centres into energy and water systems. Likewise, the announced strategic roadmap for digitalisation and AI in the energy sector will propose measures to facilitate the sustainable integration of data centres into the energy system, and the forthcoming Water Resilience Strategy will look at reducing water footprint.

The AI Act[3] requires providers of general-purpose AI models to document the computational resources used to train the model and known or estimated energy consumption[4]. The Commission, through its AI Office, is currently steering the development of a code of practice with commitments on how to implement those rules[5]. Further voluntary codes of conduct will be drawn up in the future, including as regards environmental sustainability of AI systems[6].

  • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/ai-continent_en
  • [2] https://top500.org/lists/green500/.
  • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng.
  • [4] See point (a) of Article 53(1) and points (d) and (e) of Annex XI(2) AI Act.
  • [5] See Article 56 AI Act. According to Article 56(9) AI Act, this code of practice should be ready in May 2025, in anticipation of the rules for general-purpose AI models entering into application on 2 August 2025 according to point (b) of Article 113 AI Act.
  • [6] See point (b) of Article 95(2) AI Act.
Last updated: 14 May 2025

Briefing – The future European security architecture: Dilemmas for EU strategic autonomy – 14-05-2025

Source: European Parliament

Europeans are searching for their geopolitical footprint and trying to build a European pillar in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) at a time when the United States is likely to reduce its engagement in Europe, while Russia is looking for a reset of the European security architecture, which developed at the end of the Cold War, by waging war on Ukraine. After analysing the evolution of key security organisations in Europe – NATO, the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE)/Organisation on Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the European Union (EU) – and the defence policies of individual countries, five possible scenarios for a new European security architecture were developed with the use of foresight methodology. Based on expert consultations, four of the scenarios – Antagonism, European NATO, European Defence Union and Patchwork – point to an increasingly antagonistic world in the next decade. These scenarios consider the degree of US (dis)engagement from Europe, EU-NATO relations and the possible outcome of the Ukraine war. While Antagonism can largely be seen as a continuation of the current state of play, with a solid transatlantic relationship anchored in NATO, the Patchwork scenario is the most challenging, with no strong alliance and in which Europe becomes a playground. Conversely, a new détente (relaxation of relations among global powers) leading to a more cooperative world needs a new triggering factor. This scenario, Cooperative co-existence, would possibly require over a decade to happen, and Europeans would need to compensate for further US disengagement from Europe, either through a European NATO or a European Defence Union, if they wish to matter as a geopolitical actor. Europeans therefore need to increase defence funding (in the case of further US disengagement, possibly by above 5 % of GDP), strengthen their capabilities, including nuclear and space capabilities, keep pace with the technological race and bolster the European defence industrial network. By developing its strategic autonomy, the EU might enhance its agency in defence matters, preserve transatlantic ties and allow the European interest to prevail.

Highlights – EMPL-FEMM exchange of views with Commission EVP Roxana Mînzatu on gender care gap – Committee on Employment and Social Affairs

Source: European Parliament

CARE © Image used under the license of Adobe Stock

On 19 May 2025, the Committees on Employment and Social Affairs and on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality will jointly organise an Exchange of Views with Roxana Mînzatu, Executive Vice-President for Social Rights and Skills, Quality Jobs and Preparedness on “Advancing Towards a Care Society: Addressing the Gender Care Gap”.

The European Care Strategy emphasizes the implementation of principles from the European Pillar of Social Rights, focusing on gender equality, work-life balance including flexible working, childcare, and support for children and long-term care. Building on the strategy, more attention is needed to discuss how to best support women and men in achieving the best care and work-life balance for carers, taking into account long-term care and both formal and informal workforce. This exchange aims to facilitate a deeper discussion on the gender care gap. It will also serve as a preparatory step for the EMPL-FEMM own-initiative report on this topic.

Answer to a written question – Implementation of the Bolkestein Directive and the new Italian healthcare accreditation system’s compliance issues – E-000542/2025(ASW)

Source: European Parliament

Based on the elements available, it is unclear whether Directive 2014/24/EU[1] or Directive 2014/23/EU[2] would apply to the legal relationships stemming from the accreditation system laid down in the law referred to in the Honourable Member’s question.

Even if the directives were not applicable, any national measure which, albeit applicable without discrimination on grounds of nationality, is liable to hinder or render less attractive the exercise by EU nationals of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union would still be prohibited under Article 49 of that Treaty.

The Commission recalls that according to the principle of free administration of public authorities, Member States authorities may choose to perform their public interest tasks with their own resources, or in cooperation with other authorities or to confer them upon economic operators.

  • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/24/oj/eng .
  • [2]  https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/23/oj/eng .
Last updated: 14 May 2025

Latest news – 14 May 2025 – extraordinary meeting – Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly

Source: European Parliament

On Wednesday, 14 May 2025, 14.00-15.30 , the DAFR delegation held an Extraordinary meeting in Brussels (room: SPAAK 5B1). There were two main items in the agenda:

– Exchange of views on the sustainable management of Raw Materials in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in the presence of:

  • Ms Martina Matarazzo, International Advocacy Coordinator “Resource Matters”
  • Ms Brenda Odimba, co-founder of the collective “Free Congo”

– Exchange of views on the EU’s role in addressing the crisis in Eastern DRC in the presence of:

  • Mr Thomas Stevens, Africa advisor of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium
  • Dr Marie-Paule Guillaume, member of the collective “Free Congo”

The meeting was webstreamed.

Answer to a written question – Incompatibility between the list of safe countries of origin made by the Italian Government and the criteria laid down in EU law – E-002701/2024(ASW)

Source: European Parliament

The assessment of whether a third country meets the conditions set out in Annex I of Directive 2013/32[1] for the purpose of the designation as safe country of origin is conducted by Member States’ competent authorities, based on a range of sources of information. In any event, when the concept is applied in a procedure for international protection, an individual examination of the application submitted by applicants from designated safe countries of origin must always be carried out.

Pursuant to Article 37(2) of Directive 2013/32, Member States must regularly review the situation in the designated safe countries of origin. This covers the occurrence of significant events which may affect the presumption that the concerned country can guarantee the safety of the applicant.

  • [1] Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) — OJ L 180, 29/06/2013, p. 60.
Last updated: 14 May 2025