Written question – Tariffs on corrugated paper products imposed by Türkiye since 2024 – P-001671/2025

Source: European Parliament

Priority question for written answer  P-001671/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Borja Giménez Larraz (PPE), Esther Herranz García (PPE)

In June 2024, the Turkish Government introduced a tariff of USD 85-87 on each tonne of imported corrugated paper. For European companies that operate in Türkiye, this constitutes a 20-25 % increase in costs, making it impossible to compete. Meanwhile, the supply of Turkish paper far outweighs national demand. Local industry has funnelled large investments into new factories – a large part of their production is exported to the EU, where EU companies cannot compete on a level playing field.

According to Eurostat, in 2023 alone, Türkiye exported 71 000 tonnes of corrugated paper to the EU as well as 126 000 tonnes of paper made from recycled fibre, with Germany, Hungary and Poland being the main destination countries. Against a backdrop of increasing global trade tensions, the EU should protect its manufacturers in the face of practices that distort the market and undermine competitiveness.

In view of the above:

What action will the Commission take to ensure that Türkiye reduces or lifts the tariffs that are so damaging to European paper companies?

Submitted: 24.4.2025

Last updated: 30 April 2025

Highlights – Are EU digital rules being respected? – Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

Source: European Parliament

On 28 April, IMCO Members probed the Executive Vice-President of the EU Commission Teresa Ribera on whether digital rules are being respected by everyone. The discussion focused on the EU Digital Markets Act

Members discussed key priorities, like: (a) opening up closed ecosystems — such as mobile operating systems, online search results, and digital marketplaces; (b) ensuring consumer choice; and (c) affirming that data belongs to those who generate it. On 23 April 2025, the European Commission fined Apple €500 million and Meta €200 million for non-compliance with the Digital Markets Act. The Commission found that Apple violated the DMA’s anti-steering provisions, while Meta failed to comply with the requirement to offer users a version of its service that uses less of their personal data.

Written question – Expansion of TikTok Shop in Europe and the impact on minors – E-001421/2025

Source: European Parliament

Question for written answer  E-001421/2025/rev.1
to the Commission
Rule 144
Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (Renew), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Pascal Arimont (PPE), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Cynthia Ní Mhurchú (Renew), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Maria Grapini (S&D), Eero Heinäluoma (S&D), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Grégory Allione (Renew), Christophe Grudler (Renew), Valérie Devaux (Renew), Nikola Minchev (Renew), Fabienne Keller (Renew), Engin Eroglu (Renew), Lucia Yar (Renew)

On 31 March 2025, TikTok expanded its e-commerce platform, TikTok Shop, to users in France, Germany and Italy[1], introducing a new one-click payment feature. Although it streamlines transactions, it raises concerns about its potential impact on minors and impulsive buying behaviour.

TikTok Shop has already been criticised for its strong appeal to young users. This simplified payment system could encourage excessive spending and potential debt among minors. Additionally, by making impulsive purchases even easier, this feature could contribute to increased attentional capture and addiction to digital platforms, especially among minors.

  • 1.Does the Commission consider that these kinds of features should be assessed under the Digital Services Act, particularly regarding transparency and the protection of vulnerable consumers?
  • 2.Does it plan to address such practices in the upcoming digital fairness act to ensure a fair and protective framework for European consumers?
  • 3.Is the Commission planning to engage with TikTok to evaluate the impact of this feature and ensure its compliance with the EU’s digital single market rules?

Submitted: 8.4.2025

  • [1] https://www.reuters.com/technology/tiktok-shop-steps-up-europe-expansion-with-us-future-unclear-2025-03-27/.
Last updated: 30 April 2025

At a Glance – Discharge for 2023 budget: EU decentralised agencies and joint undertakings – 30-04-2025

Source: European Parliament

During the May I plenary session, as part of the discharge procedure for the 2023 financial year, the European Parliament is due to vote on discharge for 33 EU decentralised agencies and 11 joint undertakings (JUs). The Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT) recommends granting discharge to all decentralised agencies, bodies and JUs, except for the European Union Asylum Agency (EUAA), for which it proposes that the decision on discharge be postponed.

Written question – Artificial electromagnetic pollution – E-001588/2025

Source: European Parliament

Question for written answer  E-001588/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Sergio Berlato (ECR)

In 2001, a study by the European Parliament’s Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) team, on health damage caused by electrosmog, recommended that scientists, governments, industry and the general public have access to decision-making processes and that an effective public information system be established with a view to preventing public mistrust and fear of new EMC technologies. A number of years later, on 31 May 2011, the World Health Organization reported in a press release that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) had ‘[classified] radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B)’.

In recent years, the exponential growth in artificial electromagnetic sources, such as the use of electric public and private transport, the spread of 5G and Wi-Fi in every home and public area, has effectively increased and generated new ‘electromagnetic pollution’.

In the light of the above:

  • 1.Does the Commission believe that it can harmonise EU legislation in the Member States using both its own parameters and up-to-date data, and with a focus on the cellular consequences for living beings to electromagnetic exposure?
  • 2.Is the Commission considering assessing and informing the public of the impact of electromagnetic pollution on all ecosystems?
  • 3.Lastly, does it believe that climate change and the green transition can be delivered by carrying out the requisite identification of parameters responsible for ‘biological damage’ and the severity thereof?

Submitted: 22.4.2025

Last updated: 30 April 2025

Written question – Administrative and environmental constraints imposed by the Seveso III Directive and REACH Regulation and their impact on European ammunition and powder production – E-001611/2025

Source: European Parliament

Question for written answer  E-001611/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Pierre-Romain Thionnet (PfE)

Through the ASAP programme, the Commission has committed to increasing annual ammunition shell production capacity to 2 million by the end of 2025, in particular by ramping up the production of powders and explosives.

However, the Seveso III Directive imposes especially burdensome environmental and administrative constraints on industrial defence sites, which hinder the rapid creation or expansion of industrial capacities, as shown by the difficulties encountered by the French company Eurenco[1].

Meanwhile, the REACH Regulation significantly stalls the production of chemicals essential for powder manufacturing, because of the lengthy and costly registration procedures and lack of exemption mechanisms, both for defence manufacturers and their civil suppliers[2].

At a time when the Member States urgently need to be rearmed:

  • 1.Will the Commission reduce or introduce derogations from the disproportionate burdens imposed by the Seveso III Directive on defence companies and suppliers of dual use chemicals?
  • 2.Will it also introduce similar exemptions under the REACH Regulation for chemicals essential for the production of powders and ammunition, and facilitate and speed up the registration procedures for these substances with the European Chemicals Agency?

Submitted: 23.4.2025

  • [1] https://www.euractiv.com/section/defence/interview/interview-blow-up-safety-rules-to-boost-defence-french-gunpowder-chief-says/
  • [2] https://www.opex360.com/2023/02/18/economie-de-guerre-le-reglement-europeen-reach-risque-dentraver-la-montee-en-puissance-des-stocks-de-munitions/
Last updated: 30 April 2025

At a Glance – 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Türkiye – 30-04-2025

Source: European Parliament

Türkiye has long been a strategic partner of the EU on migration, security, and trade. However, following the attempted coup in 2016, Türkiye’s democratic backsliding led the Council to freeze its accession negotiations in 2018. Although relations have since thawed, the EU is exploring a more realistic framework for bilateral relations. Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) adopted its report on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Türkiye on 9 April 2025. A debate and vote on the report are due to be held in plenary in May 2025.

At a Glance – A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world – 30-04-2025

Source: European Parliament

The European Parliament is due to adopt its vision for the European Union’s post-2027 long-term budget during the May plenary session. Ahead of the European Commission’s proposal, expected in July, the report adopted by the Committee on Budgets insists that the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) must be significantly above 1 % of the EU’s gross national income (GNI). The report rejects the ‘one national plan per Member State’ approach, as envisaged by the European Commission, as a basis for shared management of post-2027 spending.

At a Glance – Discharge for 2023 budget: European Commission – 30-04-2025

Source: European Parliament

During the May I plenary session, the European Parliament is to decide on granting discharge for the 2023 financial year to the different EU institutions and bodies. Accounting for more than 95 % of the overall EU budget, the European Commission’s budget is at the centre of the discharge procedure. The discharge of the Commission includes its six executive agencies and the grant component of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). Separate discharge is granted to the Commission concerning the management of the European Development Funds (EDFs). The Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT) recommends that Parliament grant discharge to the Commission, all executive agencies and the EDFs for the 2023 budget.

At a Glance – European water resilience strategy – 30-04-2025

Source: European Parliament

Indispensable to life and human activity, water is under multiple and severe pressures. During its May session, the Parliament is expected to adopt its recommendations on a strategy to address Europe’s most pressing water challenges, which the European Commission has pledged to table in the second quarter of the year.